Readers’ advisory has been around
since the late 19th century, becoming prevalent in the 1920s and
‘30s. In the beginning, “the general goal of early readers' advisory services was
the self-improvement of patrons.” (May, 2001) This was a process involving several meetings
between the patron and the librarian and a reading plan designed by the
librarian for the moral betterment of the patron. Reading fiction for pleasure was generally
looked down upon. Readers’ advisory
services have come a long way in the intervening years, particularly through
the work of Joyce Saricks, Nancy Brown, and Nancy Pearl.
Current trends in
RA owe much to the groundbreaking work of these individuals. Identifying elements of appeal have made it
universally possible to suggest titles that readers will enjoy based on their
reading preferences. During the last 25
years, Readers’ Advisory services have enjoyed a resurgence in popularity and have
become patron centered, non-judgmental, and aimed at finding the reader a book
that he or she will enjoy. Library staff
should be knowledgeable and courteous, and seek to make a connection between the
reader and book. As the world changes
and readers change, libraries grow, continuing to serve their users.
Where
will readers’ advisory services take us in the future? In coming years, as needs change, readers’
advisory services will change to keep pace with innovations in format, methods,
and tools. Newer formats such as
audiobooks and e-books provide opportunities and challenges. The methods that have served readers’ advisors
for many years are being seen in new ways, and opportunities for interaction
provided by new technologies are providing new tools.
RA
has traditionally been about books, but as library collections have grown to
embrace many different formats, readers’ advisory services are growing in scope
and technique. Library staff are no longer
called on merely to provide the next best book to read, but now supply readers’
advisory for E-books and audiobooks.
Each format provides its own unique challenges and opportunities.
The
appeal factors of print books also appear in audiobooks, including pacing, setting,
characters, mood, and language. However,
audiobooks, by their very nature add the additional factor of audible
presentation. “Narration changes and
intensifies every element of a book’s appeal.” (Mediatore,
2003) Does the narrator differentiate between
characters and voices? Do music and
sound effects add to the story? Does
the voice of the narrator match the pacing of the story? Other considerations include where the
listener will be while listening (can the narrator be heard over traffic?), and
what sort of media format the listener need or wants. (Trott, 2008)
E-books
allow patrons to check out books and read them without ever having to leave
their homes, but they, too provide challenges for RA. One thing readers may miss when reading an
e-book is tracking their progress by the number of pages left to read. That
feeling of desperation to finish a book when you have only a few pages left is
not felt in an e-book; nor is the surety that a clue is a red herring because
there are too many pages left for the crime to be solved yet. This affects how a reader experiences the
pacing of the story.
The
goal of RA is to make sure the reader has the best reading experience
possible. With e-books the level of
technological understanding of the reader and the format of the book will play
a part in the reading experience. So,
along with suggesting a great story, the Readers’ Advisor must be a
technological advisor as well, sometimes helping a patron figure out how to
download, access, or return an e-book, which format to choose, or how to
retrieve a pin number.
In
addition to adapting tried and true methods to new formats, readers’ advisors
will be exploring new methods to supplement the current methods. “The concept of appeal is . . . being changed
and adapted by those who helped to create it and by a new group of librarians
eager to help develop new thinking about how patrons react to, and interact
with, what they read.” (Wyatt, 2007) Current studies suggest that reading holds
appeal for the reader that is not only book-driven, but also reader-driven. “Based on readers’ views, reader-driven
appeal consists of a) curiosity; b) personal situation, needs, and mood at the
moment; c) advice of friends or specialists; and d) overall popularity of a
title/author/series.” (Dali, 2014)
Maybe a reader wants the latest Oprah
book, not because she is interested in its pacing, plot, characters, or
setting; but because Oprah or a friend recommended it. Perhaps the reader wants an introspective
book because she’s sad, or maybe just wants something different to expand her
reading horizons. “It can be as simple
as diffusing boredom in the sluggish afternoon hour or killing time waiting at
the doctor’s office.” (Dali, 2014)
Dali
also suggests providing a comfortable, informal space for readers’ advisory
interviews to take place, encouraging confidences by the reader which help the
readers’ advisor to gain insight into his reasons for reading. “The more information gained from the reader
about his tastes and interests the more complex he becomes; ambition, real love
of books, anxiety to keep up with friends, vocational difficulties all play a
part in the reasons for coming.” (Dali, 2014)
Some
libraries are now arranging fiction in genres to make it easier for patrons to
find what they are looking for. In spite
of the fact that genres are listed in the library’s catalog, many users wander
aimlessly through the stacks looking for something to read. When books are arranged in genres it creates
a more user-friendly atmosphere and encourages browsing. A side benefit to
dividing the fiction collection into genres, is that is allows statistics to be
kept that can be used in collection development.
While this is helpful for readers who like a
particular genre, the blurring of genre lines can make for tough choices when
selecting the genre in which to place an item. Paranormal romance has exploded
in recent years. Should these books be
placed with romance, fantasy, horror?
Keeping up with readers’ interests is complex and challenging, but
rewarding. “The readers’ advisor of the
future must have a willingness to venture into these less-known areas of the
reading world and to come back not only alive but also with an appreciation for
what readers in these areas enjoy.” (Trott,
2008)
New
tools will provide additional opportunities for readers’ advisory transactions.
Catalogers working together with readers’ advisors can begin to bridge the gap
between how readers describe and experience books and how libraries catalog
their collections. “If cataloguers begin
to understand the difference between their access points and how readers want to
access the collection, they may be able to assist in creating readers’ advisory
terms and content to bibliographic records.” (Terulli & Spiteri, 2012) This collaboration
is leading the way in creating the next generation of library catalogs.
Mobile app for virtual visit |
Next
generation catalogs extend relationships of trust between staff and patrons,
whether their library visit is physical or virtual, bring patrons together,
encourage collaboration, and invite user generated content. The catalog can become more than just a way
to locate library resources; it can be a path to information beyond the walls
of the library, available on multiple devices, taking readers’ advisory
services to the readers. In the digital
age where most people participate in social networking and some prefer online
transactions to face-to-face, interactive catalogs could take readers’ advisory
services to readers anywhere.
In
conclusion, many things are leading to a bright future in readers’
advisory. From its moralistic beginnings
in the early part of the 20th century to the current trends,
readers’ advisory has advanced to become a patron centered, non-judgmental
encounter intended to improve the reader’s experience. Innovators such as Joyce Saricks and Nancy
Brown have given us standard elements of appeal: tools for readers’ advisors
everywhere to help readers find books to satisfy their appetites for genre
fiction. Librarians, however, never rest in their quest
to better serve users.
Advances
in readers’ advisory service will continue.
Books are no longer the only game in town. Audiobooks and e-books have entered the
field, providing challenges and opportunities for growth to which RA has
responded. Studies are discovering new
techniques which may augment the tried and true methods, and new tools such as
next generation catalogs promise to make readers’ advisory ever more
interactive. Learning from the past,
blazing new trails and heading into the future aren’t new things for
librarians, it’s just what we do!
References
Dali, K. (2014). From Book Appeal to Reading Appeal:
Redefiing the Concept of Appeal in Readers' Advisory. Library Quarterly, 84(1),
22-48.
Dunnebeck, K. (2011). E-books and Readers' Advisory. Reference
and User Service's Quarterly, 50(4),
325-328.
May, A. K. (2001). Readers' Advisory Service:
Explorations of the Transaction. Readers Advisors Companion, 123-148.
Mediatore, K. (2003). Reading with Your Ears: Readers
Advisory and Audiobooks. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 42(4), 318-323.
Pecoskie, J. (2014). OPACs, Users, and Readers’
Advisory: Exploring the Implications of User-Generated Content for Readers’
Advisory in Canadian Public Libraries. Cataloging & Classification
Quarterly, 52(4), 431-453.
Sweeney, S. (2013, Summer). Genrefy Your Library:
Improve Readers' Advisory and Data-Driven Decision Making. Young Adult
Library Services, 41-45.
Terulli, L., & Spiteri, L. F. (2012). Library
Catalogues of the Future: A Social Space and Collaborative Tool? Library Trends,
61(1),107-131.
Trott, B. (2008, Winter). Buillding on a Firm
Foundation: Readers’ Advisory over the Next Twenty-Five Years. Reference and
User Services Quarterly, 48(2),
132-135.
Williamson, T. B. (2011). Materials Matchmaking
Articulating Whole Library Advisory. Reference and User Service's Quarterly,
50(3), 230-234.
Wyatt, N. (2007). An RA Big Think. Library Journal,
132(12), 40-43.
No comments:
Post a Comment